Campylobacter Research - Food Poisoning, Infection, Symptoms, Treatment

Campylobacter Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about Campylobacter, including details on food poisoning, infection, symptoms, treatment.


Campylobacter Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About Campylobacter

Books on Campylobacter

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



Campylobacter jejuni strains compete for colonization in broiler chicks.

Konkel ME, Christensen JE, Dhillon AS, Lane AB, Hare-Sanford R, Schaberg DM, Larson CL

School of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-4233, USA. konkel@wsu.edu

Campylobacter jejuni isolates possess multiple adhesive proteins termed adhesins, which promote the organism's attachment to epithelial cells. Based on the proposal that one or more adhesins are shared among C. jejuni isolates, we hypothesized that C. jejuni strains would compete for intestinal and cecal colonization in broiler chicks. To test this hypothesis, we selected two C. jejuni strains with unique SmaI pulsed-field gel electrophoresis macrorestriction profiles and generated one nalidixic acid-resistant strain (the F38011 Nal(r) strain) and one streptomycin-resistant strain (the 02-833L Str(r) strain). In vitro binding assays revealed that the C. jejuni F38011 Nal(r) and 02-833L Str(r) strains adhered to LMH chicken hepatocellular carcinoma epithelial cells and that neither strain influenced the binding potential of the other strain at low inoculation doses. However, an increase in the dose of the C. jejuni 02-833L Str(r) strain relative to that of the C. jejuni F38011 Nal(r) strain competitively inhibited the binding of the C. jejuni F38011 Nal(r) strain to LMH cells in a dose-dependent fashion. Similarly, the C. jejuni 02-833L Str(r) strain was found to significantly reduce the efficiency of intestinal and cecal colonization by the C. jejuni F38011 Nal(r) strain in broiler chickens. Based on the number of bacteria recovered from the ceca, the maximum number of bacteria that can colonize the digestive tracts of chickens may be limited by host constraints. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that C. jejuni strains compete for colonization in chicks and suggest that it may be possible to design novel intervention strategies for reducing the level at which C. jejuni colonizes the cecum.

Published 3 April 2007 in Appl Environ Microbiol, 73(7): 2297-305.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 Campylobacter Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



Campylobacter Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (November)
  Issue 2 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)



Campylobacter Books

Lightning strikes twice: Lessons learned from two food poisoning incidents in Japan [An article from: Public Relations Review]

Lightning strikes twice: Lessons learned from two food poisoning incidents in Japan [An article from: Public Relations Review]